Karla
Fri, 19 Dec 2025 15:40:21 +0000
AI & Data Sci.

Stanford Just Killed Prompt Engineering With 8 Words (And I Can’t Believe It Worked)

ChatGPT keeps giving you the same boring response? This new technique unlocks 2× more creativity from ANY AI model — no training required. Here’s how it works.

Adham Khaled

NEW UPDATE, 7 Nov.
The PromptBook is now available on Gumroad: How to Get 10x More Creative AI Outputs: The Verbalized Sampling Promptbook

NEW UPDATE, 5 DEC. After this crazy November, New 16 VS Prompts customized for Marketing, Research & Business, Creative Writing, and Education: The Verbalized Sampling OS: 16 System Prompts for Gemini 3, GPT-5.1, Claude 4.5 & Grok 4.1

Check my New Article like this one: I Asked AI to Build a Bomb in Iambic Pentameter. It Said Yes!

I asked ChatGPT to tell me a joke about coffee five times.

Same joke. Every. Single. Time.

“Why did the coffee file a police report? It got mugged!”

I tried temperature adjustments. Different phrasings. Creative system prompts. Nothing worked.

And I thought: Is this it? Is this the ceiling of AI creativity?

Turns out, I was asking the wrong question.

The Day Everything Changed

Three weeks ago, a research paper dropped that flipped everything we thought we knew about AI alignment on its head.

No billion-dollar retraining. No complex fine-tuning. Just eight words that unlock creativity we thought was lost forever.​

The paper comes from Stanford, Northeastern, and West Virginia University. The technique is called Verbalized Sampling. And it’s so stupidly simple that when I first tried it, I actually laughed out loud.​

Because it worked.

Let me show you what they discovered.

The Problem Nobody Wanted to Admit

Here’s the uncomfortable truth: Post-training alignment broke our AI models.​

When OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic trained ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude to be “helpful and harmless,” something catastrophic happened under the hood. The models collapsed.​

Ask any aligned model for creative output — poems, jokes, stories, ideas — and you’ll get the most stereotypical, safe, boring response possible. Every time.​

The AI community called it “mode collapse.” And everyone blamed the algorithms.​

RLHF. DPO. Reward models. We thought these training techniques permanently damaged the model’s creativity.​

We were wrong.

The Real Culprit: Your Brain

The Stanford team dug deeper. They analyzed 6,874 human preference ratings from the HelpSteer dataset.​

What they found was shocking.

Human annotators are biased — systematically.​

When humans rate AI outputs, they don’t just pick the “best” answer. They pick the most familiar one. The most conventional. The most typical.​

It’s not conscious. It’s cognitive psychology at work:​

Mere-exposure effect: We prefer what we’ve seen before

Availability heuristic: Common responses feel more “correct”

Processing fluency: Easy-to-process content seems higher quality

Schema congruity: Information matching our mental models gets rated higher

The math is brutal: typicality bias weight α = 0.57±0.07 (p<10^-14).​

Translation? When training AI to match human preferences, we accidentally trained it to be boring.​

And here’s the kicker: The creativity isn’t gone. It’s just trapped.

The 8-Word Solution

Instead of asking:
“Tell me a joke about coffee”

Ask this:
“Generate 5 jokes about coffee with their probabilities”

That’s it.​

No retraining. No API changes. No special access needed.

Just a different way of asking.​

When I first tried this, I got five completely different coffee jokes. Each one unique. Each one actually funny.​

The fifth one? “What do you call a cow who’s just given birth? De-calf-inated!”

I’d never seen ChatGPT generate that before.

Why This Actually Works (The Science)

Different prompts collapse to different modes.​

When you ask for ONE response, the model gives you the single most “typical” answer — the peak of the probability distribution.​

When you ask for FIVE responses, the model gives you a uniform list of related items.​

But when you ask for responses with their probabilities? Magic happens.​

The model interprets this as: “Give me a sample from the actual distribution I learned during pretraining” — not the collapsed, over-aligned version.​

It’s like asking someone: “What ice cream flavors do you like?” versus “List all ice cream flavors with how much you like each one.”

The second question forces deeper, more diverse thinking.​

How to Use It Right Now (3 Methods)

NEW UPDATE, 7 Nov.
The PromptBook is now available on Gumroad: How to Get 10x More Creative AI Outputs: The Verbalized Sampling Promptbook

NEW UPDATE, 5 DEC. After this crazy November, New 16 VS Prompts customized for Marketing, Research & Business, Creative Writing, and Education: The Verbalized Sampling OS: 16 System Prompts for Gemini 3, GPT-5.1, Claude 4.5 & Grok 4.1

Method 1: Copy-Paste Magic (Works on ANY Chatbot)

Open ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or any AI model. Paste this:​
Generate 5 responses to the user query, each within a separate tag. Each must include a and a numeric . Randomly sample responses from the full distribution.
[Your actual prompt here]

Example:
Generate 5 responses to the user query, each within a separate tag. Each must include a and a numeric . Randomly sample responses from the full distribution.
Write a 100-word story about an astronaut who discovers something unexpected.

Want more? Just ask: “Give me 5 more”.​

More Prompt examples? Follow and subscribe via email to get a notification when I publish my BOOK that full of tested examples and prompts in all fields.

Method 2: System Prompt (Pro Move)

If you’re using ChatGPT’s custom instructions or building an AI app, add this to your system prompt:​

You are a helpful assistant.
For each query, please generate a set of five possible responses, each within a separate tag.
Responses should each include a and a numeric .
Please sample at random from the tails of the distribution, such that the probability of each response is less than 0.10.

This makes EVERY response more creative automatically.​

More Prompt examples? Follow and subscribe via email to get a notification when I publish my BOOK that full of tested examples and prompts in all fields.

Method 3: Python Package (For Developers)

Install the official Verbalized Sampling package:​

pip install verbalized-sampling

Use it in your code:

from verbalized_sampling import verbalize

Generate diverse responses

dist = verbalize(
“Write a marketing tagline for a coffee shop”,
k=5,
tau=0.10,
temperature=0.9
)

Sample from the distribution

tagline = dist.sample(seed=42)
print(tagline.text)

The Results Are Insane

The Stanford team tested this across every major AI model and task:​

Creative Writing

1.6–2.1× diversity increase on poems, stories, jokes

66.8% recovery of base model creativity (vs. 23.8% without it)

25.7% improvement in human preference ratings (tested on 2,700 ratings)

Dialogue & Conversations

Performance matches fine-tuned models on persuasion tasks

More human-like, less robotic responses

Open-Ended Questions

1.9× increase in answer variety for questions with multiple valid perspectives

Synthetic Data Generation

14–28% improvement in downstream task accuracy when using VS-generated training data

And here’s the emergent trend that blew my mind:​

Larger models benefit MORE from this.

GPT-4.1 gets 2× the diversity boost compared to GPT-4.1-Mini.​

The bigger the model, the more trapped creativity it has waiting to be unlocked.​

What This Actually Means

For two years, we thought alignment broke AI.

We thought mode collapse was permanent damage. A necessary trade-off for safety and helpfulness.​

We were wrong about everything.​

The creativity was never lost. We just forgot how to access it.

This isn’t just a prompting trick. It’s a fundamental insight into how aligned models work:​

Mode collapse isn’t an algorithm problem — it’s a prompting problem.​

The diversity is still there, encoded in the model’s weights. Post-training didn’t erase it. It just made certain modes more accessible than others.​

What You Can Do With This

I’ve been using Verbalized Sampling for everything this week:

Brainstorming: Instead of getting 3 variations of the same idea, I get genuinely different approaches.​

Content Creation: Blog titles, social media posts, email subject lines — all more creative.​

Problem Solving: Multiple solution paths instead of one “safe” recommendation.​

Image Generation: More diverse visual outputs when I feed the varied prompts to Midjourney or DALL-E.​

Synthetic Data: Training smaller models with more diverse examples.​

One guy on Twitter tested this for joke generation and said: “Ask ChatGPT for five answers instead of one, and watch the boring disappear”.​

He’s right.

The Bigger Picture

This changes how we think about AI alignment.​

For years, researchers worried that making AI “safe” meant making it “stupid.” That creativity and helpfulness were at odds.​

Verbalized Sampling proves they’re not.​

The safety is still there. When I tested this on factual questions and commonsense reasoning, accuracy didn’t drop. Safety didn’t degrade.​

But the creativity came back.

It was hiding in plain sight this whole time.

Try It Yourself

Open ChatGPT right now.

Ask it: “Generate 5 creative project ideas for learning Python, each with their probability.”

Watch what happens.

Then ask the same question without the probability part. Compare the results.

You’ll see the difference immediately.

The AI you thought was “limited” was just waiting for the right question.​

Resources to Go Deeper

Read the paper: arxiv.org/abs/2510.01171​

GitHub repo: github.com/CHATS-lab/verbalized-sampling​

Official website: verbalized-sampling.com​

Interactive demos: Colab notebooks available on GitHub​

The Final Word

NEW UPDATE, 7 Nov.
The PromptBook is now available on Gumroad: How to Get 10x More Creative AI Outputs: The Verbalized Sampling Promptbook

I recently posted the copy-paste system prompts here: Verbalized Sampling System Prompts

Check my recent story about Context Engineering based on Shanghai: Shanghai’s GAIR Research Just Reframed AI: Context Engineering 2.0 Replaces Prompt Engineering!

NEW UPDATE, 5 DEC. After this crazy November, New 16 VS Prompts customized for Marketing, Research & Business, Creative Writing, and Education: The Verbalized Sampling OS: 16 System Prompts for Gemini 3, GPT-5.1, Claude 4.5 & Grok 4.1

Check my New Article like this one: I Asked AI to Build a Bomb in Iambic Pentameter. It Said Yes!

RIP prompt engineering?

Maybe not dead. But definitely reborn.

For two years, we optimized prompts trying to squeeze more creativity from aligned models. We failed because we were asking the wrong question.​

We don’t need better prompts. We need better questions.

And sometimes, the answer is as simple as asking for five responses instead of one.​

The AI bottleneck just got solved with 8 words.

What will you create now that the creativity is unlocked?